🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's parliament members have decided to withdraw from an international accord designed to safeguard females from abuse, including domestic abuse, following prolonged and intense debates in the legislature.

Several thousand of protesters gathered in the capital this week to voice disagreement with the vote. The final decision now lies with President the nation's president, who must decide whether to approve or reject the proposed law.

Known as the Istanbul Convention, the 2011 agreement only took effect in the Baltic state last year, requiring authorities to establish laws and support services to eliminate all types of violence.

Latvia has become the initial European Union member to begin the procedure of exiting from the convention. The transcontinental nation withdrew in two years ago, a move that human rights organizations characterized as a major regression for gender equality.

Political Debate and Opposition

The treaty was approved by the EU in 2023, yet conservative factions have argued that its emphasis on equal rights weakens traditional families and advances what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a thirteen-hour debate in the Latvian parliament, lawmakers decided 56 to 32 to exit from the convention, a action proposed by opposition parties but supported by representatives from one of the three governing partners.

The result represents a setback for centre-right Prime Minister the nation's PM, who stood with demonstrators outside the legislature earlier this week. "We will not surrender, we will continue fighting so that violence will not prevail," she declared to the crowd.

Ideological Disagreements and Reactions

One of the main political groups advocating for the withdrawal is a nationalist party, whose leader has called on the public to choose between what he terms a "traditional family unit" and "non-binary concepts with various gender identities".

Latvia's ombudswoman the rights official appealed for the treaty not to be politicized, while the organization the rights organization stated it was "not a threat to national principles, it was an instrument to achieve them".

The Thursday's vote has provoked widespread outcry both within Latvia and abroad.

22,000 people have endorsed a Latvian petition demanding the treaty to be preserved. The gender equality group the rights center has announced a demonstration for the coming week, charging lawmakers of ignoring the will of the nation's citizens.

Global Concerns and Possible Future Actions

The head of the European organization's legislative body stated that the Baltic state had made a rash decision driven by misinformation. He characterized it as an "unprecedented and deeply concerning regression for women's rights and human rights in the continent".

He added that since the transcontinental nation left the treaty in 2021, instances of femicide and violence against women had risen sharply.

Because the decision did not secure a supermajority majority, the head of state could possibly send back the legislation for additional review if he has concerns.

Head of State Rinkevics announced on digital platforms that he would evaluate the vote according to constitutional requirements, "taking into account governmental and judicial factors, rather than ideological or political perspectives".

Last week, another member of the ruling coalition, the reformist party, suggested it would not rule out petitioning to the Constitutional Court.

"This decision represents a concerning situation for gender equality not only in our nation but throughout Europe," commented a rights advocate.

• Family violence rates have been rising in multiple European countries
• The European treaty requires particular safeguards for survivors of gender-based violence
• Latvia's vote could affect comparable debates in other member states