🔗 Share this article

When government officers arrested Columbia University student a student activist in his university residence, the institute director knew a significant fight lay ahead.

The director heads a university-connected center dedicated to defending First Amendment protections. Khalil, a green card holder, had been active in pro-Palestinian encampments on campus. Months earlier, Jaffer's organization had organized a conference about free speech rights for immigrants.

"We felt a direct link with this situation, since we're part of the university," Jaffer stated. "We viewed this detention as a serious infringement of constitutional freedoms."

Major Legal Win Against Government

Last week, the institute's lawyers at the free speech organization, together with legal partners their co-counsel, secured a significant legal win when a federal judge in Boston ruled that the detention and attempted deportation of Khalil and additional activists was illegal and purposely created to suppress protest.

The Trump administration has said it will appeal the decision, with White House spokesperson a spokeswoman calling the ruling an "unacceptable decision that undermines the safety and security of the country".

Increasing Separation Separating Institute and University

The ruling raised the profile of the free speech center, catapulting it to the frontlines of the conflict against Trump over core constitutional principles. Yet the victory also underscored the growing divide between the organization and the university that houses it.

The case – described by the presiding official as "perhaps the most important to ever fall within the jurisdiction of this court" – was the first of several opposing Trump's unusual attack on higher education to go to trial.

Trial Revelations

Throughout the court proceedings, citizen and noncitizen scholars gave evidence about the atmosphere of fear and self-censorship caused by the detentions, while immigration officials disclosed details about their reliance on dossiers by conservative, Israel-supporting organizations to select individuals.

A legal expert, chief lawyer of the academic organization, which filed the lawsuit along with some of its chapters and the Middle East Studies Association, called it "the primary constitutional case of the Trump administration currently".

'Institution and Organization Are On Different Sides'

Although the court victory was hailed by supporters and scholars across the country, the director heard nothing from university leadership following the ruling – a reflection of the tensions in the positions taken by the organization and the university.

Prior to Trump took office, Columbia had represented the shrinking space for Palestinian advocacy on American universities after it summoned officers to clear its campus protest, suspended dozens of students for their activism and dramatically restricted protests on campus.

University Settlement

This summer, the institution reached a deal with the federal government to provide substantial funds to resolve discrimination allegations and accept major restrictions on its independence in a action widely condemned as "surrender" to the president's pressure strategies.

The university's submissive approach was starkly at odds with the organization's principled position.

"We're at a moment in which the institution and the institute are on different sides of some of these fundamental issues," noted a former fellow at the Knight Institute.

Organization's Purpose

This organization was established in 2016 and is located on the university grounds. It has received significant funding from the university as part of an agreement that had each contributing millions in program support and long-term financing to establish the center.

"Our vision for the institute in the long-term future is that when there is a time when the administration has overstepped boundaries and constitutional protections are threatened and few others is prepared to step forward and to say, this must stop, it will be the Knight Institute that will stepped forward," stated Lee Bollinger, a constitutional expert who established the center.

Public Criticism

Shortly after recent events, the university and the Knight Institute found themselves on opposing sides, with Knight regularly criticizing the university's handling of pro-Palestinian protests both in private communications and in progressively critical public statements.

In one letter to university leadership, Jaffer criticized the decision to penalize two student groups, which the institution said had violated policies concerning holding campus events.

Growing Conflict

Later, the director again condemned the institution's choice to summon police onto campus to clear a non-violent, pro-Palestinian encampment – resulting in the arrest of more than 100 students.

"Institutional policies are separated from the principles that are essential for the university's life and mission – such as free speech, scholarly independence, and equality," he stated in that instance.

Student Perspective

The detained student, specifically, had appealed to university administrators for protection, and in a published article written from detention he stated that "the reasoning employed by the federal government to target myself and fellow students is an outgrowth of Columbia's repression approach concerning Palestinian issues".

Columbia settled with the federal government shortly after the case wrapped in court.

Institute's Response

Following the agreement was announced, the Knight Institute published a strong criticism, concluding that the agreement approves "a remarkable shift of independence and control to the administration".

"Columbia's leaders should not have accepted this," the declaration stated.

Wider Impact

Knight doesn't stand alone – organizations such as the civil liberties union, the Foundation for Individual Rights and additional rights organizations have challenged the government over free speech issues, as have labor organizations and Harvard University.

The institute isn't exclusively focusing on university matters – in additional lawsuits to the government, the organization has sued on behalf of agricultural workers and environmental advocates opposing federal departments over environmental datasets and challenged the suppression of official reports.

Special Situation

But its defense of campus expression at a institution now associated with making concessions on it puts it in a uniquely uneasy position.

Jaffer showed understanding for the lack of "favorable choices" for Columbia's leaders while he described their decision to settle as a "serious mistake". But he stressed that despite the institute standing at the other side of its host when it comes to dealing with the president, the university has allowed it to operate free of pressure.

"Particularly currently, I appreciate that freedom for granted," he stated. "If Columbia tried to restrict our work, I wouldn't be at the university any more."